June 5, 2012
Obama, drone-strikes and human rights — Crooked Timber

I’ve been reading some of Glenn Greenwald’s recent posts with increasing horror as he details the apparent willingness of the US drone campaign to attack events where non-combatants will certainly be present, such as funerals and to try to evade moral and legal responsibility byredefining “combatant” to include any military-age male in a strike zone. I’ve also been monitoring various liberal sites and blogs for signs of a reaction and not seeing much (please correct that impression in comments). Sites that obsess about non-combatant immunity if the people firing the rockets are from Hamas are silent. Blogs that take attitudes to historic human rights violations as a litmus-test of political acceptability, have nothing to say as a liberal American President bombs civilians on the territory of nominally friendly states. Fortunately, I’m not an American citizen, so I don’t have a moral decision to take about whether to vote for Obama or not this year. If I were, I don’t think it would be an easy decision to take. Romney is clearly remarkably close in political belief to Obama, but will be beholden to the crazy Republican right, as Obama is not. That provides people with a reason to vote for Obama. But the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize winner doesn’t deserve the vote of anyone who cares about human rights, even if, pragmatically they might feel they have to give it to him.

FYI Obama’s highest approval rating nationally is in foreign policy.

(Source: moorewr)

  1. gallen reblogged this from jtem and added:
    i don’t wish drones OR atomic weapons away, hardly! I’m making a point that the rest of the world will react to how we...
  2. jtem reblogged this from gallen and added:
    I hate to say it (you post such nice photos), but I don’t believe this for one moment. Oh, I’m certain that you’re right...
  3. moorewr reblogged this from gallen
  4. jasencomstock reblogged this from moorewr and added:
    FYI Obama’s highest approval rating nationally is in foreign policy.
  5. moorewr posted this