October 13, 2012
Voting for Torture

squashed:

The National Religious Campaign Against Torture has released its annual scorecard. NRCAT scored Senators and Representatives based on a variety of votes.

Paul Ryan recieved a score of 11/100 by failing ot act against torture on eight of nine opportunities.

Ron Paul, by contrast received a score of 83. (He missed some votes and co-sponsorship opportunities.) Rand Paul is at 50%—but he’s new enough that there’s not much data.

John Boehner managed a perfect 0. Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi received 100.

I would encourage anybody interested in preventing torture by the U.S. to look through the score cards. As my libertarian friends are quick to point out, nobody has a perfect record. But … there are many shades of imperfect. If ending torture is important to you, you don’t have a lot of friends among the Republicans. And you definitely won’t have a lot of friends in Mitt “Double Guantanamo” Romney’s administration.

This is interesting and a worthwhile metric.

However, I want to caution against, what i perceive to be, the notion that a legislator’s job is to vote. Legislator’s jobs are complicated and multifaceted and judging a legislator by votes (alone) is a very binary judgement system that misses most of what their jobs and values are.

This is where I come to Paul Ryan’s (and several legislators) defense (not on torture).  Ryan is criticized for accepting stimulus money for his district while voting against the stimulus itself. Ryan, as a legislator, responded to requests from his constituents in the crafting of the stimulus bill, which the creation of is a complicated affair. His ultimate vote against the bill, even though it contained projects in his district, is not a hypocrisy, and might not even be intentional. 

On many issues, votes on bills encompass massive undertakings affecting huge swaths of our society- and judging a legislator by his vote on a bill can be about as pertinent as saying I go to work because I like sitting in traffic.

Ending torture is complicated, and “voting the bums out who voted x” is a fools errand which will never be accomplished. Often, we have to arrange it so that it is possible for the legislator to vote a certain way. Not surprisingly, with support for torture at the highest levels ever- there are a lot of things that have to change before that comes about. Our representatives are exactly that.

  1. silas216 reblogged this from squashed
  2. theadamglass reblogged this from squashed
  3. christopherhuff reblogged this from squashed
  4. jasencomstock reblogged this from squashed and added:
    This is interesting and a worthwhile metric. However, I want to caution against, what i perceive to be, the notion that...
  5. questionall reblogged this from squashed
  6. fatchance said: Very pleased that my state senators and district congressman (VA) all scored 100!
  7. squashed posted this