The National Religious Campaign Against Torture has released its annual scorecard. NRCAT scored Senators and Representatives based on a variety of votes.
Paul Ryan recieved a score of 11/100 by failing ot act against torture on eight of nine opportunities.
Ron Paul, by contrast received a score of 83. (He missed some votes and co-sponsorship opportunities.) Rand Paul is at 50%—but he’s new enough that there’s not much data.
John Boehner managed a perfect 0. Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi received 100.
I would encourage anybody interested in preventing torture by the U.S. to look through the score cards. As my libertarian friends are quick to point out, nobody has a perfect record. But … there are many shades of imperfect. If ending torture is important to you, you don’t have a lot of friends among the Republicans. And you definitely won’t have a lot of friends in Mitt “Double Guantanamo” Romney’s administration.
This is interesting and a worthwhile metric.
However, I want to caution against, what i perceive to be, the notion that a legislator’s job is to vote. Legislator’s jobs are complicated and multifaceted and judging a legislator by votes (alone) is a very binary judgement system that misses most of what their jobs and values are.
This is where I come to Paul Ryan’s (and several legislators) defense (not on torture). Ryan is criticized for accepting stimulus money for his district while voting against the stimulus itself. Ryan, as a legislator, responded to requests from his constituents in the crafting of the stimulus bill, which the creation of is a complicated affair. His ultimate vote against the bill, even though it contained projects in his district, is not a hypocrisy, and might not even be intentional.
On many issues, votes on bills encompass massive undertakings affecting huge swaths of our society- and judging a legislator by his vote on a bill can be about as pertinent as saying I go to work because I like sitting in traffic.
Ending torture is complicated, and “voting the bums out who voted x” is a fools errand which will never be accomplished. Often, we have to arrange it so that it is possible for the legislator to vote a certain way. Not surprisingly, with support for torture at the highest levels ever- there are a lot of things that have to change before that comes about. Our representatives are exactly that.
-
sarahlee310 likes this
-
comix likes this
-
silas216 reblogged this from squashed
-
silas216 likes this
-
anotherword likes this
-
bernardocamejo likes this
-
lafermeassurance likes this
-
alice44 likes this
-
quixylvre likes this
-
blissandzen likes this
-
alternrg likes this
-
theadamglass reblogged this from squashed
-
bourbonismycopilot likes this
-
christopherhuff reblogged this from squashed
-
resurrecthobbes likes this
-
jasencomstock reblogged this from squashed and added:
This is interesting and a worthwhile metric. However, I want to caution against, what i perceive to be, the notion that...
-
theweaversweb likes this
-
empiricalmediatheory likes this
-
questionall reblogged this from squashed
-
questionall likes this
-
fatchance said:
Very pleased that my state senators and district congressman (VA) all scored 100!
-
fatchance likes this
-
jasencomstock likes this
-
berezina likes this
-
missed-something-once likes this
-
squashed posted this