September 13, 2011
Obama's Spending Plan: $250,000 Per Job

chrisafer:

jasencomstock:

andrewgraham:

50statepress:

Doing the math.

From CNBC, with a further link to this article:

… the overall AJA plan will cost $250,000 per job created (excluding the interest expense) …

And that’s how much it costs for Obama to purchase one vote … created or saved.

I was able to accurately guess the byline on this before I even clicked through. Not sure if that’s a good thing or a bad thing.

The Tax Extension last December was $500,000/ job.

“Wouldn’t it be better just to have a free national lottery and mail $200,000 checks to a lucky 1.9 million people?”

Yes, that would be better if you discount the wireless networks, roads and bridges and other infrastructure built, the pupils taught, and the crimes prevented by the people in those jobs.

He just wants a lottery because it’s basically how he made all of his money and he assumes it’s the only way anyone can make it.

September 13, 2011
Obama's Spending Plan: $250,000 Per Job

andrewgraham:

50statepress:

Doing the math.

From CNBC, with a further link to this article:

… the overall AJA plan will cost $250,000 per job created (excluding the interest expense) …

And that’s how much it costs for Obama to purchase one vote … created or saved.

I was able to accurately guess the byline on this before I even clicked through. Not sure if that’s a good thing or a bad thing.

The Tax Extension last December was $500,000/ job.

September 8, 2011
muppetpants:

(via Boing Boing)

muppetpants:

(via Boing Boing)

(via fungazi-deactivated20120817)

August 18, 2011
A political memoir slash campaign diary slash position paper slash rallying cry slash fiction

imwithkanye:

According to The Huffington Post, the copyright page of the e-versions of Christine O’Donnell’s new book state that it ‘is, in fact, a novel.’

A disclaimer reads: 

This is a work of fiction. All of the characters, organizations and events portrayed in this novel are either products of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously.”

Good thing O’Donnell didn’t get picked for Oprah’s book club because Oprah would never let her walk off that interview. 

August 16, 2011
CNN: Shock over ‘respectable’ lives behind masks of UK rioters

notime4yourshit:

Hooded youths walk past a looted department store in Clapham Junction, London, on August 8.

Before they started appearing in court, most people assumed London’s rioters and looters were unemployed youths with no hope and no future.

 So there was much surprise when details of the accused began to emerge, and they included some from wealthy backgrounds or with good jobs.

 Those passing through London’s courtrooms on Tuesday and Wednesday — some courts sat overnight to cope with the numbers — have included a teaching assistant, a lifeguard, a postman, a chef, a charity worker, a millionaire’s daughter and an 11-year-old boy, newspapers reported.

The tabloid Sun newspaper wrote in its opinion page on Thursday of the “sick” society described by Prime Minister David Cameron: “The sickness starts on welfare-addicted estates where feckless parents let children run wild.”

But its front-page headline told a different story about the accused: “Lifeguard, postman, hairdresser, teacher, millionaire’s daughter, chef and schoolboy, 11.”

The Daily Mail reported: “While the trouble has been largely blamed on feral teenagers, many of those paraded before the courts yesterday led apparently respectable lives.”

The upmarket Daily Telegraph devoted its page three to the case of Laura Johnson, the 19-year-old daughter of a company director who pleaded not guilty to stealing £5,000 ($8,000) of electrical goods, under the headline: “Girl who has it all is accused of theft.”

The newspaper said she lived in a converted farmhouse in the leafy London suburb of Orpington, Kent, with extensive grounds and a tennis court, had studied at one of the best-performing state schools in the country and now attends the University of Exeter.

Reporter Andrew Gilligan wrote in the Daily Telegraph: “Here in court, as David Cameron condemned the ‘sickness’ in parts of British society, we saw clearly, for the first time, the face of the riot: stripped of its hoods and masks, dressed in white prison T-shirts and handcuffed to burly security guards.

“It was rather different from the one we had been expecting.”

He added of the defendants at Highbury Magistrates Court in north London: “Most were teenagers or in their early twenties, but a surprising number were older.

“Most interestingly of all, they were predominantly white, and many had jobs.”

Read More

(via robot-heart-politics)

August 12, 2011
imwithkanye:

You know what really grinds my gears? 
When a DC-based publication’s newsletter is sponsored by America’s Natural Gas Alliance (ANGA). The outlet is meant to bring to the forefront issues related to energy, environment and the influence on the Hill by Big Oil among other things. Yet, there, right under a mention of a true clean, renewable energy is the sponsor’s ad about how great gas is. Let me tell you, it isn’t! But I’m not here to debate the values of fracking, reckless drilling or the pollution of our waterways by an unclean method of energy extraction. No, I’m here to rant and complain about the fact that if I want to pitch a story that takes a harder look at the ANGA it won’t be published in this newsletter. And it’s not the journalist’s fault (because he’s a great guy and publishes great stuff), it’s the conflict-of-interest instituted by the paper itself… Diane.

imwithkanye:

You know what really grinds my gears? 

When a DC-based publication’s newsletter is sponsored by America’s Natural Gas Alliance (ANGA). The outlet is meant to bring to the forefront issues related to energy, environment and the influence on the Hill by Big Oil among other things. Yet, there, right under a mention of a true clean, renewable energy is the sponsor’s ad about how great gas is. Let me tell you, it isn’t! But I’m not here to debate the values of fracking, reckless drilling or the pollution of our waterways by an unclean method of energy extraction. No, I’m here to rant and complain about the fact that if I want to pitch a story that takes a harder look at the ANGA it won’t be published in this newsletter. And it’s not the journalist’s fault (because he’s a great guy and publishes great stuff), it’s the conflict-of-interest instituted by the paper itself… Diane.